IdNumber of occurencesForms
10522 1 ersity. however, the stability of these ecosystem services can be undermined by the increased d 
10752 1 ersity. however, the stability of these ecosystem services can be undermined by the increased d 
10756 1 ersity. however, the stability of these ecosystem services can be undermined by the increased d 
11807 1 ersity. however, the stability of these ecosystem services can be undermined by the increased d 
12067 1  the short term, they are degrading key ecosystem services by accelerating rates of species ext 
15364 1 esses in relation to global climate and ecosystem services stability, teher are no reliable pro 
7051 1  effects of agricultural change on this ecosystem service, however, are not universal and the m 
13310 1 dynamics of ecosystems. this relates to ecosystem services and includes the relationship betwee 
12037 2 ndscapes, biodiversity, productions and ecosystem services provided by soils, tested for signif 
sity, agrosylvopastoral productions and ecosystem services, no attempt had been made so far to  
11235 1 e world with some of its most important ecosystem services in terms of forest and food resource 
12479 6  estimate the benefits derived from the ecosystem services provided by the terrestrial ecosyste 
rural landscapes, rivers and moorlands. ecosystem services are the processes by which the natur 
 upon which human civilization depends. ecosystem services provide us with economic benefits in 
england and will calculate the value of ecosystem services at regional and national levels. res 
icant amount of work in identifying the ecosystem services involved, assessing the key issues a 
ions. a gap analysis will highlight any ecosystem services that could not be valued and will id 
12672 1  importance of biodiversity and related ecosystem services in developing countries, focusing on 
15575 4 loss, and has important effects on many ecosystem services. much recent research has focused on 
ch has focused on valuating and mapping ecosystem services at various spatial scales, but predi 
explicitly address how land-use affects ecosystem services mediated by biodiversity are rare. b 
re rare. biological pest control is one ecosystem service threatened by agricultural intensific 
12490 2 ects may occur. however, the effects on ecosystem services of exceedance of these thresholds ha 
 approaches to determine which assesses ecosystem services more comprehensively in terms of imp 
13794 2 rms of insights in landscape analyze of ecosystem services , trade-offs between bundles of serv 
ernance challenges involved in managing ecosystem services at a landscape scale. in addition to 
7667 1 ular urban ecosystems. the assesment of ecosystem services of the urban biodiversity its a comp 
12595 1  have potential benefits for a range of ecosystem services such as carbon capture and other gov 
14329 1 workshops covering different aspects of ecosystems services research. the workshops are in engl 
2472 1 l system that maximizes provisioning of ecosystem services and economically efficient food prod 
11505 1 mes 1. increased benefits obtained from ecosystem services by local low-income populations thro 
11234 2  grazer mobility, and attendant loss of ecosystem services and of poor people s livelihoods. th 
 credible and relevant insight into the ecosystem services and poverty implications of differen 
396 2 ike organic farming on biodiversity and ecosystem services thus requires knowledge of both the  
 predatory insects, pollinators and two ecosystem services along a time-since-transition gradie 
13729 1 examine how biodiversity contributes to ecosystem services like pollination and resilience in s 
7642 1 f the soil and thus to the provision of ecosystem services. betsi the project aims to synthesiz 
12059 1 rces, helping to reconcile human needs, ecosystem services and biodiversity in the sustainable  
10045 3  value to the environmental benefits or ecosystem services like biodiversity and carbon storage 
t is this broad concept of payments for ecosystem services that our project aims to address. in 
ough new projects based on payments for ecosystem services with the twin objective of alleviati 
12480 9 scape, recreation space. the concept of ecosystem services has been developed internationally b 
or example on developing inventories of ecosystem services, understanding environmental limits  
g environmental limits and valuation of ecosystem services. the purpose of this project, howeve 
ect, however, is to assess the types of ecosystem services provided within a particular case st 
 impacts of different policy options on ecosystem services, or impact of development on local e 
ices, or impact of development on local ecosystem services. in doing so it should provide for a 
h better understanding of the nature of ecosystem services provided by the green grid and their 
e a means of integrating the concept of ecosystem services into existing land use planning fram 
 sustainability appraisal. importantly, ecosystem services provide a different conceptual appro 
10476 1  reducing biodiversity and the value of ecosystem services. not surprisingly, habitat fragmenta 
12592 1 n the provision of the majority of such ecosystem services, performing major roles in soil proc 
11490 2                                     the ecosystem services of deltas often support high populat 
lnerable coastal environments and their ecosystem services face multiple stresses in the coming 
15583 1 eptional biodiversity, provide critical ecosystem services and support the livelihood of vulner 
15327 1  biodiversity, ecosystem integrity, and ecosystem services to humans. we predict that climate w 
7490 5 ces soil biodiversity and the resulting ecosystem services. soilservice will value soil biodive 
soil biodiversity through the impact on ecosystem services and propose how these values can be  
aluing soil biodiversity in relation to ecosystem services. objectives: develop methods to valu 
jectives: develop methods to value soil ecosystem services during different pressure of land us 
poral scales soil biodiversity and soil ecosystem services are vulnerable to disturbance.  
7220 3 no, the location of fish shoals are all ecosystem services provided by seabird colonies. most r 
to identify the conservation status and ecosystem services provided by marine birds in three co 
costs and benefits, economic and social ecosystem services rendered by seabirds. we have indeed 
12729 2 nce-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services note: as a contribution, there is no 
nce-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services unep/ipbes/3/3  
12711 1 runs to 2010 will estimate the value of ecosystem services and produce outputs in autumn 2009 a 
12713 1 nce-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services  
12742 2 of changes in character and delivery of ecosystem services in the english landscape. specifical 
countryside character 2.determine which ecosystem services can be attributed to landscape chara 
12637 1 he soil natural capital stocks and soil ecosystem services framework, and the research conducte 
12401 4  in the msfd descriptors of ges and key ecosystem services for the period 2007/08 to 2030. the  
ir framework to the concepts of ges and ecosystem services key customer purpose: the five key o 
oject are: objective 1 – prioritise key ecosystem services in the marine environment and identi 
ective 3 – establish sensitivity of key ecosystem services to changes in drivers and associated 
6960 2 is a serious threat to biodiversity and ecosystem services. agri-environmental schemes to measu 
s. these cover a wide range of taxa and ecosystem services, and thus can make it possible to de 
7678 1 ges, and to deploy the model to predict ecosystem services linked to the physical and biotic co 
421 1  expected commensurate reduction in the ecosystem services that they provide. however, the natu 
2169 1 l changes in turn have consequences for ecosystem services, focusing on pollination. for this p 
9880 1 heir interrelationships with a range of ecosystem services and dimensions of poverty and wellbe 
15532 1 that both forces contribute to build up ecosystem services theory in drylands. finally, uncroac 
7632 1 of the planet and the sustainability of ecosystem services. in particular, global warming is af 
7636 1 e perspective of their own functioning, ecosystem services that they make and their suitability 
10720 1 environment, with an associated loss of ecosystem services, will accelerate their poverty. the  
13754 2 e projects and whether biodiversity and ecosystem services are favoured or disfavoured. neverth 
ulated aims of either restoring certain ecosystem services to more pristine levels, or developi 
11402 9 an agriculture is challenged to provide ecosystem services such as carbon storage and protectio 
ypothesis that the delivery of multiple ecosystem services in semi-natural grasslands, and its  
bial functional diversity, and multiple ecosystem service delivery. vital will focus on mountai 
egional assessments of biodiversity and ecosystem services. wp1 will use stakeholder semi-direc 
interviews and meetings to identify key ecosystem services associated with the maintenance of f 
rends and condition of biodiversity and ecosystem services and their underlying mechanisms usin 
wp5 will generate projections of future ecosystem service delivery according to alternative man 
uding extreme changes. their impacts on ecosystem services will be modelled using both a statis 
ity and ecological processes underlying ecosystem services delivery, and of impacts of manageme 
481 6 egional assessments of biodiversity and ecosystem services. wp1 will use stakeholder semi-direc 
 site to identify with stakeholders key ecosystem services associated with the maintenance of f 
rends and condition of biodiversity and ecosystem services and their underlying mechanisms. thi 
, and their coupled effects on multiple ecosystem services. wp4 will test the robustness of thi 
wp5 will generate projections of future ecosystem service delivery according to alternative man 
uding extreme changes. their impacts on ecosystem services will be modelled using both a statis 
10486 1 fits provided to them by ecosystems, or ecosystem services level, gain input from ngos and usin 
10141 1 system resilience, and their associated ecosystem services in response to high risk natural haz 
11169 1 system resilience, and their associated ecosystem services in response to high risk natural haz 
13987 2 spite substantial trade-offs with other ecosystem services. this has led to an increasing inter 
essments’ of connections among multiple ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes. the core 
7675 6                                         ecosystem services are underpinned by fundamental ecolo 
t of ecosystems. our hypothesis is that ecosystem services can thus be modelled as networks of  
sis by assessing alternative futures of ecosystem services under combined scenarios of land-use 
ld and integrate models of the relevant ecosystem services and land-use change. our assessment  
nding of how biodiversity and different ecosystem services are interconnected. trade-offs and s 
 south of the city. as beneficiaries of ecosystem services, local and regional stakeholders wil 
12594 14 ains little ecological understanding of ecosystem services, particularly in terms of how and wh 
 assess cost-benefit flows of different ecosystem services in upland and lowland peatlands. as  
ata and scientific evidence on peatland ecosystem service provision as well as the transferabil 
g detailed case studies. the concept of ecosystem services is interdisciplinary and critically  
rovision and quantification of peatland ecosystem services for each site. for each case study w 
case study we will identify and map key ecosystem services provided by peat. the project team h 
evaluate cost-benefit flows of peatland ecosystem services, we will determine suitable valuatio 
ion data required to undertake peatland ecosystem service valuation based on peatland maintenan 
de assements of cost-benefiot flows for ecosystem services from the case study sites and map op 
e capacity of each site to increase its ecosystem service provision and assess the case for res 
e provisions and compare differences in ecosystem service provision between sites. we will asse 
 top 10 criteria for assessing peatland ecosystem service provision to facilitate monitoring of 
 to scope and set-up a phase 2 peatland ecosystem service project in order to provide critical  
restoration in england and wales. it as ecosystem services are a matter of societal choice, we  
7629 3 the functioning of urban ecosystems and ecosystem services that they provide is a major environ 
duction of exotic floral species in the ecosystem service of pollination urban. the results obt 
, will propose measures to preserve the ecosystem service of pollination in urban and non-urban 
15493 1 y biodiversity affects the provision of ecosystem services under global change is now a priorit 
15116 1 sions taken that affect the flow of the ecosystem services.  
15117 1 sions taken that affect the flow of the ecosystem services.  
15518 1 a new landscape planning model based on ecosystem services management and meant to avoid potent 
10661 6 ndscape can be termed the energyscape . ecosystem services is a collective term to describe the 
ic understanding of the energyscape and ecosystem services could help guide the deployment of l 
nergy within the study area and the key ecosystem services likely to be affected by the develop 
cription of the energyscape and the key ecosystem services for the study area. because some mod 
between energy generation and different ecosystem services, and amongst the ecosystem services. 
ent ecosystem services, and amongst the ecosystem services. some interactions will be antagonis 
10912 6 ndscape can be termed the energyscape . ecosystem services is a collective term to describe the 
ic understanding of the energyscape and ecosystem services could help guide the deployment of l 
nergy within the study area and the key ecosystem services likely to be affected by the develop 
cription of the energyscape and the key ecosystem services for the study area. because some mod 
between energy generation and different ecosystem services, and amongst the ecosystem services. 
ent ecosystem services, and amongst the ecosystem services. some interactions will be antagonis 
11158 6 ndscape can be termed the energyscape . ecosystem services is a collective term to describe the 
ic understanding of the energyscape and ecosystem services could help guide the deployment of l 
nergy within the study area and the key ecosystem services likely to be affected by the develop 
cription of the energyscape and the key ecosystem services for the study area. because some mod 
between energy generation and different ecosystem services, and amongst the ecosystem services. 
ent ecosystem services, and amongst the ecosystem services. some interactions will be antagonis 
11170 6 ndscape can be termed the energyscape . ecosystem services is a collective term to describe the 
ic understanding of the energyscape and ecosystem services could help guide the deployment of l 
nergy within the study area and the key ecosystem services likely to be affected by the develop 
cription of the energyscape and the key ecosystem services for the study area. because some mod 
between energy generation and different ecosystem services, and amongst the ecosystem services. 
ent ecosystem services, and amongst the ecosystem services. some interactions will be antagonis 
11420 6 ndscape can be termed the energyscape . ecosystem services is a collective term to describe the 
ic understanding of the energyscape and ecosystem services could help guide the deployment of l 
nergy within the study area and the key ecosystem services likely to be affected by the develop 
cription of the energyscape and the key ecosystem services for the study area. because some mod 
between energy generation and different ecosystem services, and amongst the ecosystem services. 
ent ecosystem services, and amongst the ecosystem services. some interactions will be antagonis 
11421 6 ndscape can be termed the energyscape . ecosystem services is a collective term to describe the 
ic understanding of the energyscape and ecosystem services could help guide the deployment of l 
nergy within the study area and the key ecosystem services likely to be affected by the develop 
cription of the energyscape and the key ecosystem services for the study area. because some mod 
between energy generation and different ecosystem services, and amongst the ecosystem services. 
ent ecosystem services, and amongst the ecosystem services. some interactions will be antagonis 
11701 6 ndscape can be termed the energyscape . ecosystem services is a collective term to describe the 
ic understanding of the energyscape and ecosystem services could help guide the deployment of l 
nergy within the study area and the key ecosystem services likely to be affected by the develop 
cription of the energyscape and the key ecosystem services for the study area. because some mod 
between energy generation and different ecosystem services, and amongst the ecosystem services. 
ent ecosystem services, and amongst the ecosystem services. some interactions will be antagonis 
11702 6 ndscape can be termed the energyscape . ecosystem services is a collective term to describe the 
ic understanding of the energyscape and ecosystem services could help guide the deployment of l 
nergy within the study area and the key ecosystem services likely to be affected by the develop 
cription of the energyscape and the key ecosystem services for the study area. because some mod 
between energy generation and different ecosystem services, and amongst the ecosystem services. 
ent ecosystem services, and amongst the ecosystem services. some systems interactions will tend 
9896 6 ndscape can be termed the energyscape . ecosystem services is a collective term to describe the 
ic understanding of the energyscape and ecosystem services could help guide the deployment of l 
nergy within the study area and the key ecosystem services likely to be affected by the develop 
cription of the energyscape and the key ecosystem services for the study area. because some mod 
between energy generation and different ecosystem services, and amongst the ecosystem services. 
ent ecosystem services, and amongst the ecosystem services. some interactions will be antagonis 
12503 1 to conserve or enhance biodiversity and ecosystem services, the ecn provides unique national ca 
11593 1 rine biodiversity, providing invaluable ecosystem services as millions of people are economical 
14375 5 that supply life-support services, i.e. ecosystem services, of tremendous value, e.g. water pur 
997, the work by defined the concept of ecosystem services as the representation of goods and s 
 boost by documenting the importance of ecosystem services to human well-being and showing that 
tists and policy makers, the science of ecosystem service mapping is still a key front in which 
ulating services. two key challenges of ecosystem services primary production and climate regul 
9875 1 organic farming could deliver important ecosystem services, including higher pollinator abundan 
9878 1 ce strategies of natura 2000 areas, the ecosystem services provided by beech forests and market 
7716 1 most organisms on earth, allowing major ecosystem services and play a fundamental role in the c 
12198 1 ement prescriptions on biodiversity and ecosystem services over the life of an els agreement. i 
15577 7 to agricultural production by providing ecosystem services such as crop pollination and biologi 
attern on farmland biodiversity and the ecosystem services important for agricultural productio 
ollowed, would improve biodiversity and ecosystem services in farmlands without compromising ag 
nds have higher biodiversity and better ecosystem services than farmlands with less semi-natura 
elated to biodiversity and provision of ecosystem services. if this is true, then it may be pos 
uld restore biodiversity and associated ecosystem services by increasing farmland heterogeneity 
cy-makers that enhance biodiversity and ecosystem services in farmland.  
15505 1 ng alters the decomposer system and its ecosystem services through changing the soil environmen 
11269 5 lready providing valuable and necessary ecosystem services which support livelihoods and econom 
er frame of other, often over-stressed, ecosystem services. for example, despite apparent abund 
or to gdp in both countries, with other ecosystem services related income, such as that from to 
 terms of water and land and associated ecosystem services. however, the complexity of existing 
nked issues: water, land and associated ecosystem services for supporting poverty alleviation a 
11416 5 lready providing valuable and necessary ecosystem services which support livelihoods and econom 
er frame of other, often over-stressed, ecosystem services. for example, despite apparent abund 
or to gdp in both countries, with other ecosystem services related income, such as that from to 
 terms of water and land and associated ecosystem services. however, the complexity of existing 
nked issues: water, land and associated ecosystem services for supporting poverty alleviation a 
11501 2 ities rely significantly on the flow of ecosystem services proposal therefore brings together e 
he study is to examine the link between ecosystem services and impacts on nutritional and socio 
11877 1 vestments in sustainably managed forest ecosystem services. our contribution: to address a crit 
12034 1 es but also the quality and quantity of ecosystem services. these forests are dominated by soci 
10253 1  in particular are important due to the ecosystem services they provide. the species compositio 
10254 1  in particular are important due to the ecosystem services they provide. the species compositio 
10754 1  in particular are important due to the ecosystem services they provide. the species compositio 
11529 1  in particular are important due to the ecosystem services they provide. the species compositio 
11533 1  in particular are important due to the ecosystem services they provide. the species compositio 
9994 1  in particular are important due to the ecosystem services they provide. the species compositio 
10644 1 d and source of food. almost all of the ecosystem services provided by reefs are founded upon l 
2186 1  monitoring of population viability and ecosystem services.  
7217 1  east africa demonstrate a multitude of ecosystem services making these herbaria a major compon 
10270 1 ific value upland peatlands offer vital ecosystem services from carbon storage, biodiversity, w 
13341 4  assessed will include biodiversity and ecosystem services, including provisioning, regulating, 
d strategies of households dependent on ecosystem services derived from highland aquatic resour 
ticipatory monitoring and evaluation of ecosystem services and biodiversity will be developed.  
 conserving biodiversity and sustaining ecosystem services will be communicated to potential us 
7481 4  assessed will include biodiversity and ecosystem services, including provisioning, regulating, 
d strategies of households dependent on ecosystem services derived from highland aquatic resour 
ticipatory monitoring and evaluation of ecosystem services and biodiversity will be developed.  
 conserving biodiversity and sustaining ecosystem services will be communicated to potential us 
9874 1 arine biodiversity providing invaluable ecosystem services as millions of people are economical 
12255 1 w the effect of loss of set-aside other ecosystem services mediated by soil to be determined, p 
10520 2 ither mitigate loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services or that exacerbate losses. an unprec 
 new species configurations that affect ecosystem services in unpredictable ways. with climate  
11528 2 ither mitigate loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services or that exacerbate losses. an unprec 
 new species configurations that affect ecosystem services in unpredictable ways. with climate  
9951 2 ither mitigate loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services or that ex-acerbate losses. an unpre 
 new species configurations that affect ecosystem services in unpredictable ways. with climate  
10252 3 d policy discussions on tropical forest ecosystem services are currently happening in two disjo 
d models for quantifying and monetising ecosystem services. on the other hand, political ecolog 
l attempt to consider the full range of ecosystem services, including forest products, hydrolog 
12477 8 tate of the natural environment and the ecosystem services it provides to people - highlight an 
ctive delivery and communication of the ecosystem service approach to meet the aims of the proj 
acteristics, which could be used in the ecosystem services approach - objective 3: indicate the 
gland’s terrestrial environment and the ecosystem services it provides. - objective 4: compare  
tate of the natural environment and the ecosystem services it provides to people - objective 6: 
tate of the natural environment and the ecosystem services it provides to people 4 information  
ctive delivery and communication of the ecosystem service approach 6 metadata relating to the s 
tate of the natural environment and the ecosystem services it provides to people.  
12749 1 nce-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services  
11695 9                                     the ecosystem services approach emphasises the many ways na 
d enriches people s lives. valuation of ecosystem services can contribute to ecosystem conserva 
ts must tackle the relationship between ecosystem services and wellbeing with reference to envi 
ith reference to environmental justice. ecosystem services tend to benefit some stakeholders mo 
. ecosystem management that distributes ecosystem services fairly and includes all stakeholders 
cademic fields on the feedbacks between ecosystem services and human wellbeing. the conceptual  
lyses by looking at the distribution of ecosystem services among stakeholders, and by attending 
socially excluded people dependent upon ecosystem services living in developing countries. equi 
on will strengthen the contributions of ecosystem services to poverty alleviation, with particu 
13343 1        knowledge about biodiversity and ecosystem services is well advanced in the european sci 
10411 1 posefully manage to obtain provisioning ecosystem services , such as food, fiber, and biofuel.  
2474 2   maintenance of biodiversity and other ecosystems services essential for human well-being requ 
 and property structure are influencing ecosystem services, including biodiversity, and that di 
7618 1  native ants and other insects, affects ecosystem services and associated causes them damage an 
9957 1 improve scientific understanding of the ecosystem services provided by the above; increase the  
10902 1 affect each other. by understanding how ecosystem services affect coffee production we can deve 
10986 1 affect each other. by understanding how ecosystem services affect coffee production we can deve 
12187 2 farming systems that provide a range of ecosystem services, including , increases the sequestra 
onal benefits for the delivery of other ecosystem services, including nutrient retention and po 
11231 1  improved research and evidence base on ecosystem services, their dynamics and management and t 
10987 2 s the development of tools for managing ecosystem services for health and agricultural improvem 
fying and mapping the links between the ecosystem services and the health and well-being of the 
12408 1  / impacts of wave energy extraction on ecosystem services 3 is there a balance to be struck.  
10896 2 nce local stakeholders understand which ecosystem services are of interest to them and have pre 
mpacts of the changes on the ecosystem, ecosystem services and their benefits and values, and e 
12020 1       the microbes project studied soil ecosystem services, in particular the decomposition of  
7679 1 s of biodiversity and provide important ecosystem services , statisticians with expertise in de 
10408 8 will impact provisioning and regulatory ecosystem services; how these changes might affect rura 
rch on the impacts of climate change on ecosystem services and rural livelihoods. our research  
ll be conducted at four sites where the ecosystem services provided by forests and hydrological 
elop systems dynamic models of climate, ecosystem services and rural livelihoods in these lands 
on of synergies and trade-offs in these ecosystem services under various management regimes. th 
 assess the impact of climate change on ecosystem services provision and local livelihoods. thr 
ded to assess climate change impacts on ecosystem services and rural livelihoods for informing  
o adapt to climate change and to manage ecosystem services for the benefit of the rural poor.  
11413 8 will impact provisioning and regulatory ecosystem services; how these changes might affect rura 
rch on the impacts of climate change on ecosystem services and rural livelihoods. our research  
ll be conducted at four sites where the ecosystem services provided by forests and hydrological 
elop systems dynamic models of climate, ecosystem services and rural livelihoods in these lands 
on of synergies and trade-offs in these ecosystem services under various management regimes. th 
 assess the impact of climate change on ecosystem services provision and local livelihoods. thr 
ded to assess climate change impacts on ecosystem services and rural livelihoods for informing  
o adapt to climate change and to manage ecosystem services for the benefit of the rural poor.  
13767 7                    humanity relies upon ecosystem services, however, the human modification of  
s resulted in the decline of many other ecosystem services. now individuals, groups and governm 
correct this problem by including other ecosystem services in policies and management. however, 
ovision of a single or a small group of ecosystem services, for example carbon sequestration, w 
anagement can alter the supply of other ecosystem services, such as water quality or pollinatio 
ynamic models of the interactions among ecosystem services. these models will be closely linked 
nked to three empirical case studies of ecosystem service interactions in human dominated lands 
13814 2 se schemes—in terms of biodiversity and ecosystem service benefits to society—has not been rigo 
mies of crop pests, and to evaluate the ecosystem services provided by the latter two groups, a 
12483 1  policy objectives against the value of ecosystem services and potential impacts that takes dat 
10656 2                                     the ecosystem services framework offers considerable potent 
cult choices between different types of ecosystem services . it will use a process of expert-le 
13776 1 tion of our marine environment, and the ecosystem services it provides.  
14414 5 agricultural land-use, biodiversity and ecosystem services, and to create state-of-the-art deci 
 affect farmland biodiversity and thus, ecosystem services. we are also interested to learn mor 
ed to benefit farmers, biodiversity and ecosystem services. finally, we will provide decision-m 
table measures and schemes that benefit ecosystem services. sapes is a collaboration between lu 
able agriculture where biodiversity and ecosystem services are managed as assets to society. sa 
7271 1  indicators of overall biodiversity and ecosystem services productions. indicator species class 
10985 4  explicitly identify trade-offs between ecosystem services and between the wellbeing of differe 
es of expert and stakeholder workshops. ecosystem services have become popular for understandin 
vide a framework to study trade-offs in ecosystem services and facilitate the discussion of sha 
r-group in policy discussion related to ecosystem services, and thus contribute to developing p 
457 1 t in eastern africa show a multitude of ecosystem services, which make these plants an importan 
15506 1 ng alters the decomposer system and its ecosystem services through changing the soil environmen 
12167 1 nly for biodiversity but also for wider ecosystem services and within the context of climate ch 
461 2 g, localization of fish schools are all ecosystem services provided by seabird colonies. more r 
mine the status of preservation and the ecosystem services provided by seabirds in three countr 
7683 1 l therefore aim at preparing mapping of ecosystem services and predicted evolution over a 3-dec 
12189 11                                         ecosystem services are the benefits people obtain from  
re, are contributing to declines in the ecosystem services provided by nature, with possible co 
of initiatives are underway to maintain ecosystem services and potentially to reverse their dec 
ial to contribute to the maintenance of ecosystem services. the english environmental stewardsh 
rovides one such opportunity to enhance ecosystem services in the farmed environment. environme 
vironmental stewardship may also affect ecosystem services, for example: winter cover crops may 
stewardship may best be used to enhance ecosystem services. this project will address these iss 
onmental stewardship options to enhance ecosystem services and the ideal placement of these wit 
nmental stewardship options may improve ecosystem services. the first will use well-developed m 
ions in the english uplands may enhance ecosystem services. this will involve novel combination 
knowledge of how to manage the land for ecosystem services. dissemination of the results and tr 
12491 3 ntributes to the provision of different ecosystem services through analysis of current levels o 
 recommendations on how the delivery of ecosystem services through the es could be measured; to 
might be achieved; and to recommend how ecosystem service delivery might be enhanced through th 
9858 1 value green roofs can provide important ecosystem services within the urban environment from bi 
13761 1 cture, all with direct impacts on basic ecosystem services and biodiversity. currently, the lar 
15587 6 d through land management decisions and ecosystem services. regards aims to unravel the mechani 
s enhance or decrease the resilience of ecosystem services 4 can multi-level governance structu 
hat affect biodiversity and the related ecosystem services 5 does regional integration and glob 
ugh their effects on flows of goods and ecosystem services, people and information 6 how do eco 
sses combine to determine resilience of ecosystem services regards will address these questions 
ario outcomes in terms of biodiversity, ecosystem services, material well-being, and associated 
14365 4 transitions and the mapping accuracy of ecosystem services. method the methods is divided in 5  
er change and degradation; - mapping of ecosystem services with high resolution sensing data; - 
 for monitoring forest cover change and ecosystem services, - provide new insights in the impac 
ack mechanisms of forest transitions on ecosystem services. the results of this study on forest 
13759 1 o regime shifts associated with loss of ecosystem services. theory and modeling indicates that  
15357 7 o loss of biodiversity and provision of ecosystem services, i.e. of human well-being. this proj 
he emergent field of studies related to ecosystem services. its major aim is to document how ec 
ve, affect patterns of biodiversity and ecosystem services and explain the involved processes.  
ity and a broader range and quantity of ecosystem services than degraded ecosystems; additional 
the levels of restored biodiversity and ecosystem services will depend upon the initial degrada 
the levels of restored biodiversity and ecosystem services as a function of the ecosystems init 
ng, and the amounts of biodiversity and ecosystem services that have been restored in agrarian  
12489 1 s a whole and the sustainable supply of ecosystem services on which we depend. it will also rec 
7715 1  root-soil relationships, will quantify ecosystem services and link them to certain composition 
13332 1  biodiversity essential for maintaining ecosystem services. important and threatened services w 
10405 1 oject is to promote the contribution of ecosystem services to alleviating poverty worldwide. in 
2541 1 els will be developed for evaluation of ecosystem services. for open lowland an economic model  
7623 1  organisms to communities to strengthen ecosystem services to which they contribute. in this co 
15588 1  gradients, which may serve to regulate ecosystem services in the face of climate extremes and  
15580 1 versity and may provide a wide range of ecosystem services a supranational stakeholder board wi 
7477 1  ec soil thematic strategy as essential ecosystem services for the well-being and economic succ 
13350 7 ces soil biodiversity and the resulting ecosystem services. soilservice will value soil biodive 
soil biodiversity through the impact on ecosystem services and propose how these values can be  
aluing soil biodiversity in relation to ecosystem services. objectives: • develop methods to va 
ctives: • develop methods to value soil ecosystem services during different pressure of land us 
poral scales soil biodiversity and soil ecosystem services are vulnerable to disturbance. • det 
determine and predict sustainability of ecosystem services at different types of land use • bui 
ent can influence soil biodiversity and ecosystem services over european scale. • interacting w 
7317 1 uropean biodiversity, and provide vital ecosystem services to crops and wild plants. there is g 
13352 1 uropean biodiversity, and provide vital ecosystem services to crops and wild plants. there is g 
10897 3 iently broad and strong to suggest that ecosystem service delivery in the region is changing an 
e decision-makers receptive to the role ecosystem services in improving the material condition  
 tool chooses to ignore the benefits of ecosystem services and the costs of ecosystem degradati 
11847 2 alleviation through improving catchment ecosystem services. the resulting datasets will be used 
iation through improvement of catchment ecosystem services in both china and sa through press r 
11688 2 ers in the region that use payments for ecosystem services. the value of mangrove ecosystems to 
he science and practice of payments for ecosystem services. this will be further developed and  
13353 1 le to maintain and restore biodiversity ecosystem services. to achieve this, a transactional en 
12748 1 runs to 2010 will estimate the value of ecosystem services and produce outputs in autumn 2009 a 
11407 3 rough the benefits they can derive from ecosystem services. we know from previous studies, that 
 from previous studies, that many vital ecosystem services who will work with the project to as 
ve analysis of the political economy of ecosystem services for poverty alleviation, based on a  
10050 12  the availability and sustainability of ecosystem services. however, achieving social and econo 
experienced a significant change to the ecosystem services they receive due to the construction 
eliant on the floodplain and associated ecosystem services which in turn are vulnerable to abus 
. the proposed study aims to assess the ecosystem services that contribute to human welfare on  
tudy will identify and categorise those ecosystem services produced by the system before and af 
l include an economic evaluation of the ecosystem services and water/land productivity of the s 
 of wellbeing supported and affected by ecosystem services and similarly human activities which 
inally, governance drivers which impact ecosystem services important to wellbeing will be ident 
ited use and understanding of wellbeing-ecosystem service information by management authorities 
ndrance to the successful management of ecosystem services and the improvement of human wellbei 
ddress many of the impacts of decreased ecosystem services such as reduced agricultural potenti 
improve understanding of the impacts on ecosystem services and the complex links to human wellb 
11879 2 tablishment of ecological processes and ecosystem services, these being for the benefits of bot 
 restoration and the restoration of two ecosystem services, those of pollination and pest contr 
13805 1 onservation and management of biota and ecosystem services.  
10903 1  of local communities depend on crucial ecosystem services. however, a sustainable management o 
11801 1  of local communities depend on crucial ecosystem services. however, a sustainable management o 
11852 1 , but also on the preservation of other ecosystem services, including the conservation of speci 
2489 1 on local resource dependency to measure ecosystem services. third, we integrate all analyses to 
15581 12 ll focus on functional diversity, urban ecosystem services, institutions, economics and resilie 
le management of urban biodiversity and ecosystem service generation and communicate this to im 
ders. cluster i: urban biodiversity and ecosystem services what are the drivers behind loss/enh 
rivers behind loss/enhancement of urban ecosystem services and how do they interact across scal 
ange on ecosystem functioning and urban ecosystem services what are the roles of species intera 
ional diversity for generation of urban ecosystem services cluster ii. valuation of biodiversit 
uster ii. valuation of biodiversity and ecosystem services what are the methods suitable for mo 
-monetary valuation of biodiversity and ecosystem services in the urban landscape how can monet 
scape how can monetary and non-monetary ecosystems service values be integrated for decision-ma 
rnance and management of ecosystems and ecosystem service what are the most effective mechanism 
isms for the governance of non-marketed ecosystem services what is the role of formal versus in 
ns for ensuring effective governance of ecosystem services and facilitating needed urban transf 
9958 1 d compromise the provision of essential ecosystem services. a recent, severe heathland fire at  
10548 1 s a key driver of change in ecosystems, ecosystems services and their links with the causes and 
11324 1 s a key driver of change in ecosystems, ecosystems services and their links with the causes and 
10893 1 ecosystems and the associated impact on ecosystem services and biodiversity at a range of scale 
10768 1  novel mechanism to pay communities for ecosystem services provided by the amazon. pi: john gra 
10900 1 he known species. it provides important ecosystem services threaten its continued functioning.  
2497 2 bility to change, the predictability of ecosystem services, and the resistance to biological in 
ate change, and invading species on the ecosystem services of lakes.  
15574 7 egional assessments of biodiversity and ecosystem services. wp1 will use stakeholder semi-direc 
 site to identify with stakeholders key ecosystem services associated with the maintenance of f 
rends and condition of biodiversity and ecosystem services and their underlying mechanisms. thi 
, and their coupled effects on multiple ecosystem services. wp4 will test the robustness of thi 
wp5 will generate projections of future ecosystem service delivery according to alternative man 
uding extreme changes. their impacts on ecosystem services will be modelled using both a statis 
ity and ecological processes underlying ecosystem services delivery, and of impacts of manageme 
10145 2 tanding of how decision-makers can link ecosystem services in river basins to poverty alleviati 
kages between the water cycle and other ecosystem services of the wetlands. both basins are imp 
10979 2 tanding of how decision-makers can link ecosystem services in river basins to poverty alleviati 
kages between the water cycle and other ecosystem services of the wetlands. both basins are imp